Submit an Article

Please use this feature to submit any articles that you would like the Green European Foundation to publish. Please include a short bio on the author and details on the copyright. Articles can be submitted in English, French, Hungarian, Dutch, Spanish, or German. If the original article is in any other language, please submit a short description of the piece in any of the above languages and GEJ can consider translation. The GEJ Editorial Board reserves final right to decide on publication. Download our article guidelines PDF

File uploader. Accepts .rtf, .doc, .docx and .txt file formats up to 3MB in size.


Green European Foundation Mobile Site
Contact Us:
Green European Journal

The European venue
for Green ideas

Journal Articles by Language

The success story of the 'right2water' European Citizens Initiative

“Right2water” is the first successful European Citizens’ Initiative and has got everyone talking about water. What accounts for the success of this initiative, and how can others learn from it?


This article was originally published in German by the Heinrich Boell Stiftung.

The impetus for the Citizens’ Initiative “right2water” came from two developments. Firstly, the fact that several EU Member States abstained when the human right to water was acknowledged by a Resolution of the UN General Assembly. Secondly, the repeated attempts by the European Commission to liberalise the water sector, most recently in the context of the directive on concessions. We wanted to put a stop to this. Water is a public good, not a tradable commodity. So water supply is not an issue for the single market. It should be organised on a national and public basis, with the aim of genuinely providing all citizens with access to clean drinking water and basic sanitation. It was the member unions of the European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) who initiated the European Citizens’ Initiative for the human right to access to clean water and basic sanitation and who coordinate it. In Germany, the public services union ver.di took the lead.

“Right2water” is the first successful European Citizens’ Initiative – it has succeeded in gathering over a million signatures from more than seven EU countries within the stipulated time period.  The first hurdle was cleared half a year before the deadline (in February 2013): by that point, 1 million people across the EU had given their support to the ECI. Only three months later the second condition was met: the required minimum number of signatories was reached in more than seven countries. On 13th September, the day the signatures were handed over, altogether thirteen countries had exceeded the minimum number and there were almost 1.9 million signatures. We therefore had almost double the number of signatures required, and almost double the number of countries where the minimum number of signatories had been reached.

A success already: water will remain a public good

“Right2water” has already achieved significant political successes before the one-year deadline has passed. When the number of signatures exceeded a million, both the European Commission and the Federal German government signalled for the first time a willingness to talk about exemptions for the water sector in the directive on concessions. It is thanks to the immensely strong engagement of citizens in the Initiative that on the 25th June in the negotiations at EU level over the concessions directive, the water sector was removed from the scope of the directive. A major success, which came in response to the Initiative’s call not to liberalise water resources management.

After the success of “right2water” has been formally certified in December, following the verification of all the signatures by the national authorities, the European Parliament and the European Commission will invite the initiators to a hearing. At this hearing we intend to put forward very detailed proposals for EU legislation which are designed to guarantee the human right to water and to provide lasting protection for its status as a public good.

The Commission has to give a response to these proposals in the form of a communication by March 2014. Only then will we know what impact this instrument for citizens’ participation can really have. But regardless of the Commission’s response, the candidates for the elections to the European Parliament in May 2014 will similarly have to take a stand on the demands made by “right2water”. We are therefore furthering a public European debate on this issue – a second political benefit of the Citizens’ Initiative.

What accounts for the success of “right2water”?

The formal hurdles which have to be cleared by a European Citizens’ Initiative, as introduced in April 2012, are high; so not many people will be able to use the ECI successfully. The “right2water” initiative was so successful only because the initiators were able to make use of pan-European structures and to reach out to the broader populations of the Member States through both officials and supporters of the European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU). The solid financial footing was also a prerequisite for the campaign. In Germany, which provided the lion’s share of the signatures with over 1,38 million, the strong support of NGOs (BUND, attac, BBU, DGB, GIB, Grüne Liga and many more) and of some industry associations was extremely important, as they spread the concern behind the ECI throughout society at large.

Another important point is the topic of water itself, with which people generally have a positive emotional connection. That’s why many people decided not only to sign for themselves, but also to get involved and to collect signatures. In Germany the fact that the topic was picked up by the popular media was important.

There are many hurdles to be cleared

Initiators without access to already functioning pan-European structures will have great difficulty clearing both formal hurdles – one million signatures from at least seven countries (with minimum numbers in each) within one year. This can be seen in the 16 ECIs currently running. Only the Catholic Church’s anti-abortion campaign – one likewise backed by an organisation with a lot of money and members – has any prospect of success.

At the same time, a year is a long time to keep a campaign going on a voluntary basis. What makes it even more difficult is that the different national time-cycles for issues on the public agenda represent a significant obstacle to achieving the required minimum number of signatures in seven countries. Another big problem is the error rate in the paper signatures. For data protection reasons, the lists cannot simply be laid out in public and – also in view of the scope of the individual data collected – considerable help and support is therefore necessary.

Many people need to have the difference between the online petitions of the many very different public platforms (such as and the European Citizens’ Initiative explained to them. Finally, not only does the subject matter of the ECI have to be European in content terms, but it needs to actually concern citizens across the EU sufficiently to make them get involved. The ECI initiators therefore need to target their public relations work across the entire media landscape – not only the political sector but the cultural sector too, and at regional as well as national level.

Conclusion: what can a European Citizen’s Initiative actually achieve?

If the topic of the ECI is one which is currently the subject of legislation in the EU then the initiative can influence the process before its conclusion, as was the case with “right2water” with regard to the concessions directive.

The strong support for “right2water” in civil society (in Germany) succeeded in persuading many local councils and Land parliaments as well as the Bundestag (lower house) and the Bundesrat (upper house) to put the issue of water as a public good on their agendas. All of them apart from the Bundestag passed resolutions in support of the initiative.

Many citizens have taken an interest for the first time in how their water services are provided. Many of them are now actively calling for protection for the good public water services in Germany. Such involvement in public affairs is good for our democracy and has also contributed to the development of a European public sphere. We have been very encouraged to see how many people want something from Europe and are prepared to get involved.

Date Published


Authors for this article

This Article is In The Debate

See all articles In the debate

Article Links


  1. The right to water – a British perspective.

    Here in the UK the ancient ‘riparian’ rights that were available to anyone owning the land beside a stretch of natural waterway have been transferred in part to the State, and thence to private sector water companies. This ensures that public access to an adequate supply of pure water is preserved. So far, so good.

    But for around 6 million people here, and 3 million more in the Republic of Ireland, that public water supply has been hijacked by the dental public health sector. The public water supplies are deliberately and illegally adulterated with fluorosilicic acid, in the absurd belief that this contaminant will actually prevent the decay of teeth of deprived young children.

    Despite overwhelming public rejection, this compulsory and illegal mass medication continues unabated – indeed, right now, another 18 million citizens in England also face the imminent contamination of their water supplies through this practice of ‘fluoridation’, if the British government has its way.,

    This compulsory medication through the conscription of the public water supply is carried out in the spurious name of ‘the public good’, despite having been ruled as being in violation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Commission itself is equally culpable, having repeatedly refused to ensure that Member States fluoridating the public water supplies of their citizens comply with the medicinal law of the EC that prohibits this practice.

    The use of public water supplies for the administration of physiologically active substances is totally incompatible with the concept of water as a ‘public good’. It sets a dangerous precedent – that Member States may forcibly medicate their citizens, even in the face of overwhelming public opposition and its gross violation of medical ethics.

    I therefore call on all signatories of this Citizens Initiative to declare State-imposed adulteration of the public water supplies unacceptable. NO substance should be added to such a public good with the intent to modify the physiology of the public consuming that good, regardless of whether the public consents to such action. Consent can be manipulated, ethical behaviour may not.

    This Initiative MUST ensure that only the ‘water for human consumption’ specified in the EC Drinking Water Directive be provided to the public. This public good must not be devalued by allowing States to impose covert medical experimentation on their unsuspecting and unwilling subjects.

    Douglas Cross, CSci, CBiol, FSB

Write a comment

Too many numbers, not enough messages

In the debate, 15/10/13


Too many numbers, not enough messages

A first analysis of the Greens’ campaign in the German Federal elections and of the role played by finance policy

How Powerful Interests Undermine the Energy Transition in Europe

How Powerful Interests Undermine the Energy Transition in Europe

The European Union (EU) is currently setting out its climate and energy policy framework for 2030. Future targets are hotly debated in Brussels. Scenario modeling and statistics are supposed to inform politicians in their decision making. However, it seems that these information sources are often biased in line with the interests of powerful lobby groups thus putting at stake the delivery of the EU climate and energy security and the transformation into a low-carbon economy,

Social Web
  • Subscribe
    to the Journal

    Please submit your contact details if you wish to receive updates on the GEJ. You will receive an online version of our quarterly and a monthly update on our latest articles.

    Rest assured your information will not be transmitted to any third party.

    Foundation behind
    the Journal

    The Green European Foundation is the European level political foundation affiliated to the Green political family.

    GEF aims to contribute to a lively European sphere of debate and to ‘Europeanise’ the political debate within and beyond the Greens.

    The views expressed in the Green European Journal are those of the authors alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Green European Foundation or the Green European Journal.

    Green European Foundation

    The Green European Foundation is the European level political foundation affiliated to the Green political family.
    With the financial support of the European Parliament. Contact Us: